Leeds councillors given social media lesson after complaint

Councillors in Leeds have been advised on their use of social media after a complaint was made about a member of the Council.

The complaint was brought before the Council’s Standards Committee Assessment Sub-Committee in July but the Committee decided to take no action.

A report of the committee meeting failed to name the councillor or give details of what he/she was supposed to have said, justifying the omission “by virtue of Regulation 8(5) of the Standards Committee (England) Regulations 2008” (No? Me neither, but read on).

“The Assessment Sub-Committee agreed that the subject Member was not
acting, claiming to act, or giving the impression they were acting in their official capacity during the incident,” the report said.

“Therefore the Code of Conduct did not apply to the subject Member’s alleged actions, and there was no potential breach of the Code of Conduct disclosed by the complaint,” it added.

Lessons to learn

The committee found, however, that there were “lessons to learn”.

“The Assessment Sub-Committee requested that the Deputy Monitoring
Officer produce and circulate a note to the Group Whips about the use of blogs and other social media by Councillors, particularly with regard to being aware of the capacity they are writing in and considering whether the Code of Conduct may apply to their actions or comments.”

(If anyone out there gets sight of the note, I’d quite like to have a look at it)

“Not in the public interest”

And what about the suppression of the details of the complaint?

Well, Regulation 8(5) says that written summaries of meetings “may give the name of any member, co-opted member, former member or former co-opted member, who was the subject of the allegation, unless such disclosure is not in the public interest or would prejudice any investigation.”

What’s got me baffled is that if the blog post or tweet or Facebook update at issue didn’t infringe councillors’ code of conduct and is already (presumably) in the public domain, then why is it “not in the public interest” for details to be released?

Bizarre.

Advertisements

About the leeds citizen

contributions to this blog welcome
This entry was posted in News and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Leeds councillors given social media lesson after complaint

    • Cheers, Ian. So Morley Independents’ leader Robert Finnigan says the complaint was made against him by former Morley town councillor Paul Jamieson. All we’re missing now is what the complaint was about…

  1. …and why the Council’s Standards Committee feel that being upfront about it all is “not in the public interest”.

  2. Ian Grey says:

    There is an FOI on this topic- they say there isn’t a Leeds specific guidance for Councillors and there won’t be any.

    http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/members_code_of_conduct_use_of_s#incoming-212620

    Something doesn’t stack up here.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s