Leeds council does quiet u-turn and publishes details of arts grants cash

Leeds City Council has had a change of heart over its decision not to release details of how much it is giving to local arts organisations under its new “Leeds Inspired” funding scheme.

Just nine days after telling the leeds citizen that such information was being kept secret for reasons of “commercial confidentiality” and could only be accessed through a Freedom of Information request, the council performed a quiet U-turn and published the details on its website.

Only time will tell whether the council department involved – Libraries, Arts and Heritage – has genuinely seen the light in questions of transparency (geddit?!) or whether this openness is just a one-off prompted by the intervention of council chief executive Tom Riordan (see tweets).

Last year the department used “commercial confidentiality” to withhold the names of organisations to whom it made 45 payments worth in total over £800,000.

Anything left in the pot?

I’m still baffled as to why commercial confidentiality was used in this arts grants case. Or am I missing something from the list of recipients of the grants posted below?

What’s got me baffled too is the amount of cash in the Leeds Inspired arts grants pot.

In January the council was saying there would be £300,000 plus an unspecified amount diverted from its main arts grants scheme.

So far £205,000 has gone on large grants (applications have now closed) and £30,000 is scheduled to be spent in total throughout the year on small grants.

That leaves at least £70,000 that hasn’t been spent yet. Where’s that going? Maybe the pot has shrunk. Who knows.

In the meantime here’s the list:


About the leeds citizen

contributions to this blog welcome
This entry was posted in News and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Leeds council does quiet u-turn and publishes details of arts grants cash

  1. Paddle Paddle says:

    Whilst I normally applaud your ferreting etc. I have to say I think the Council had reason to keep the information back. There wasn’t any conspiracy- as some thought. The organisations are mainly small community based groups not the local arts giants.

    Plus under the Freedom of Information rules there is something in there that makes allowances for 3rd parties.

    Were the Council trying to protect the smaller groups perhaps?

    • Hey Paddle Paddle, if there were a reason to protect the “smaller groups” then fair enough. The Council could have told me to bugger off and stuck to its “commercial confidentiality” guns. But it didn’t. And what could any of these organisations – large or small – possibly need protecting from?

  2. Carol Lee says:

    Any update on what happened to the £70,000?

  3. there was a further round of small grants awarded in May amounting to £7,000 in total. Am working on putting all the grants from all sources in one place, but I keep getting side-tracked…

  4. Carol Lee says:

    Oops just tried the LCC link and page not found….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s