Recommended “options” for popular north Leeds centre involve demolition work and land sale

WestParkCentreLeeds City Council is pressing on with its plans to decide the long-term fate of a popular community centre in the north of the city despite an internal enquiry having been launched into the centre’s sudden closure last November.

Senior councillors meeting later this week (Friday 15th February) are being asked to endorse the idea of pursuing two options for the centre – both of which involve demolition work and selling off council land at the site for development.

There’s been controversy for years around the the future of the West Park Centre on Spen Lane, which up until its closure was being used by some 2,000 people every week for a range of city-wide and local activities.

Built in the 1950s as a school, the building has needed money spending on it for years, but the cash hasn’t been forthcoming.

Suspicions have been voiced for years that council officials have wanted to sell the site off to developers, and that a policy of “planned neglect” has been in operation.

No mention of internal enquiry

civic_hall_fullThe controversy was re-ignited in November when officials suddenly shut the building down citing safety concerns over the electrical system.

When local councillors challenged the closure decision and secured an internal council enquiry into how it was taken, it had been thought that the council’s leadership might delay pressing on with making long-term plans for the centre.

But there’s no reference to the enquiry in the report that’s been prepared for next week’s council leaders’ meeting.

The options

westparkcentre4The two options that the council leaders are being asked to approve for more detailed costs and proposals are:

Option A: demolish a little less than half (44%) of the building at a cost of £373,000, carry out £1.15m backlog maintenance on what’s left, and sell off the cleared site for between £2m and £2.4m

(the council report says 40% of the building wasn’t being used prior to its closure – a figure that’s being challenged)

Option B: demolish the whole building at a cost of £627,000; build a new, smaller centre for local community use in one part of the site (at a cost of £700k to £1m) and sell off the rest for development for £2.9m

Option A leaves the council some £500k in profit, Option B leaves it with around £1.3m in the bank, minus the cost of finding permanent new homes for the city-wide council services that were using the building till it was shut down.

Other options were looked at, but are not being recommended by council officers.

They include retaining the whole building, which would require £2.2m for backlog maintenance work – “significantly more” for full refurbishment. But there’s no cash allocated for it in the budget, the report notes.

Selling off the whole site is another option that appears to have been discounted, though the report doesn’t go into much detail as to why: the sale could fetch around £3.5m for the council’s coffers, but would leave the local area without its community facilities.

Main user not coming back?

CLYMSept09finishedlogo_1Campaigners say that one of the ways the centre has been deliberately run down is through council-sponsored services stopping using the building, such as classes delivered by Education Leeds.

They’ll take little comfort from the news in the report that the centre’s principal council user – Education Leeds’ music and arts service for schools, ArtForms – is apparently working successfully from its “temporary” new home at City of Leeds School in Woodhouse.

“…the music service would like to continue delivering (its service) from the school,” the report says.


About the leeds citizen

contributions to this blog welcome
This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Recommended “options” for popular north Leeds centre involve demolition work and land sale

  1. Irving08 says:

    The WPC is one of the few, notable pieces of mid-century modern architecture still standing in Leeds. It is a city-wide asset and should be treated as such. The politiciams and officials of Leeds have many virtues, but imagination and vision are not among them. They here have an opportuity to redeem themselves and restore to its original condiiton a building of which any city would be proud. Uses and users from all quarters of the city and beyond it would not be hard to find. As a school even it would be superior to most of the recent PFI constructions I have seen. To anyone who thinks my admiration for this building misguided, I invite you to take a quiet walk around its perimeter one day, taking in the internal yard, flanked on one side by a magnificent gymnasium. Sadly, you won’t be able to admire the main school hall, with tis balcony seating and gnerous dimensions, since this neglected building is now closed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s